I thought the FDA findings were pretty unbiased...

Anyway, I have no real desire to prove that non-human animal models are dangerous (I'm sure that your mind is set at this point no matter what I say, anyway). I was merely pointing out that the subject is far from clear cut. Many people have solid reasons for believing that using non-human animal models is more dangerous than not, and many people have solid reasons for believing that using them is more beneficial than not.

I think it's valuable to acknowledge the difference in people's beliefs about this, quite literally, life or death subject.