Chinese Zoo Stages Tiger Attacks for Tourists.
The headline is a little misleading. The "tiger attacks" are staged by dumping a cow out the back of a truck into the tiger enclosure, which is an open area that the buses full of tourists drive around. There are several warnings about graphic content, but I didn't see anything gross. Upsetting probably, but not gross.
I haven't heard the audio, so I'm not sure if this is being sold as enrichment or if its unapologetically for entertainment value. Suffice it to say, this wouldn't happen in a North American zoo.
The headline is a little misleading. The "tiger attacks" are staged by dumping a cow out the back of a truck into the tiger enclosure, which is an open area that the buses full of tourists drive around. There are several warnings about graphic content, but I didn't see anything gross. Upsetting probably, but not gross.
I haven't heard the audio, so I'm not sure if this is being sold as enrichment or if its unapologetically for entertainment value. Suffice it to say, this wouldn't happen in a North American zoo.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 12:20 pm (UTC)Ethically, though, should it really matter that the tigers eat the cow this way vs the simple act of turning it into filets via mechanical methods? There's a good reason not to do it because of the potential damage to the tigers, but the rights of the cow seem less limiting because the tigers are eating it in one form or another. I can see that the cow's suffering is somewhat prolonged, but to be honest, the tigers looked to be pretty quick about the kill.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 04:28 pm (UTC)Also
Date: 2007-05-28 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 06:03 pm (UTC)The real question is "are we ethically or morally obligate to quickly kill a higher order animal before feeding it to another animal?" I don't think natural rights theory holds here, and we're basing the decision more on our squeamishness about the nautre of the tigers kill (essentially the same as a kosherite slaughter).
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 06:47 pm (UTC)The real question is whether we have a moral responsibility to the cow, to put it down before feeding it to the tigers. While the animals are being tossed into it for entertainment value, they're not being treated in a way that resembles dogfighting, as in this case, the cow was born for the sake of being food, and the tigers aren't in grave peril.
Like I said, I feel squeamish, but it's not activating a moral feeling, which has me wondering why.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 07:58 pm (UTC)We can play horribly bloody and violent games, but are squicked by a predator killing prey; not senseless mayhem, but food gathering. We readily eat the same animals, when they have been slaughtered and dissected well away from our sheltered existence.
I then have to confront my hypocrisy, and am now left to ponder...are they ruthless and calloused, or are we coddled, clueless hypocrits who live in a self-serving fairyland?
Your thoughts? I haven't yet been able to shake my conditioning, and reach a conclusion.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 08:40 pm (UTC)But kind of sad since the goats are not used to being prey so of course they don't know what to do :(
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 09:11 pm (UTC)I don't think either position is much better than the other as they tend to lead to behaviors that seem both mutually useful, and mutually inhibiting (in military terms, a good comparison would be our emphasis on search and rescue, which preserves experienced soldiers and pilots, vs a a viewpoint that allows for human wave attacks. Each probably can seem odd to the other group, but both seem to have some balance).
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 09:46 pm (UTC)We are, collectively, hypocrites. I see it every day at work when people who ate meat for lunch are horrified to see me feeding mice to the foxes, or when they learn what happens to the pigs.
I wonder if there is some middle position, where you are aware of the lives and deaths of the animals you eat, without seeing them as raw materials whose feelings don't matter.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 11:00 pm (UTC)It isn't a lack of respect for food animals so much as a different mindset than one maintains for companion animals.
I think I would happily eat a human before I would eat a dog; dogs are so much more sensitive, fair, and intelligent than most humans.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-28 11:17 pm (UTC)I don't think we will enjoy being occupied by the Chinese, frankly. It will be a real buzzkill for most of us.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:26 pm (UTC)