urbpan: (with chicken)
[personal profile] urbpan
I'm listening to an NPR editorial railing against the slaughter and export of unwanted race horses , by Frank DeFord. I've mentioned the issue here, and at the vegetarians community before.

I'm a bit of a knee-jerk liberal, I confess. Usually on NPR I agree with the liberal editorials and disagree with the conservatives (yes they have conservative commentors). This issue isn't liberal or conservative, it's blindfolded sentiment versus no other solution offered.

The commentor did not offer an alternate method of disposing of the thousands of horses that are unwanted, nor did he mention that the same fate awaits cows (mentally equal if not equally aesthetically pleasing animals) by the thousand-fold. He did ask if we would do the same to our dogs and cats. Why not? 10 to 15 million unwanted animals euthanized every year, and we just send them up chimneys. I'd rather someone eat them than they become part of the greenhouse effect. Not very sentimental, I know, but I don't think that sentiment should be the primary factor in solving problems.

Date: 2005-11-10 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urbpan.livejournal.com
By "someone" I'm guessing you mean human.

I don't care who eats them.
But someone (I suppose the Federal Government) is making money selling horse meat overseas, so if we landfilled or vulturized (me make new word) tens of thousands of horses, someone's going to complain about the "waste." (of money, not life)

while watching animals run around in circles is not so much
Right. And getting back to the original editorial, it was presented by a sports journalist, who defended horse racing as a sport and form of entertainment.

Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 6th, 2026 08:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios