urbpan: (wading)
[personal profile] urbpan
Whenever paleontology is in the news, there seems to be an obligatory pop culture reference. Personally, I think that the history of life is interesting enough without needing a similarity to movie character to grab my attention. (I know that hobbits were literary characters first, but the timing of the Homo florensis story made it a LOTR movie tie-in.)

I have objections to the latest fossil story from both the natural history side and as a lover of monster movies. Dakosaurus andiniensis, compared to Godzilla in this MSNBC story, was only 13 feet long, and had flippers, meaning it was primarily if not totally a marine animal. The only resemblance to Godzilla is the large heavy skull full of sharp teeth (which looks more like an oversized gila monster skull if anything.) I'm no Toho expert, but I think the character of Godzilla was based on Tyrannosaurus rex: bipedal, towering, and so on.

Not to nitpick (too late!) or anything. Dakosaurus seems like a pretty interesting animal. A crocodile relative with a blunt snout and legs built for swimming and not for walking. Where did it lay its eggs? (For that matter, where did Ichthyosaurus lay its eggs? It was so totally marine that its body had evolved into a fishlike shape--can't imagine it clambering onto the beach like a sea turtle. Perhaps it retained its eggs in its body like some snakes do, giving live births.) What was its life like? The article suggests that it ate other reptiles. Sure, why not? It didn't have the long jaws and needle-like teeth that fish-specialist crocodilians have today.

Rather than Godzilla, it seems to me that the closest comparison for this animal would be the orca. Large marine vertebrate that eats other vertebrates. I guess they figure that Godzilla will make for a grabbier headline.

Date: 2005-11-18 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brush-rat.livejournal.com
I think its a matter of style over substance. No one's been able to explain to me why a monorail is better than elevated light rail. The mere fact your putting in a monorail means someone is convinced that it's more an attraction than a commuter system. I think the same wrong headedness that comes up with that idea is drawn to running them as well. Regardless, every time I see our monorail, or someone mentions it, I still hear the monorail song from the Simpson's in my head.

Date: 2005-11-19 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cottonmanifesto.livejournal.com
And Leonard Nimoy was in that episode! What a coincidence!

Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 7th, 2026 05:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios