===I would agree, but they would use the money to fund even more roads, and not do anything in regards to public transportation, or even really repair the roads we do have with something designed to last more than 5 years....
Great point. It's actually in the Washington State Constitution that any money collected from the gas tax must be used only for road improvement projects. I wish they would invest in more public transportation!
*nods* Two reasons for that: The US is the number 1 consumer of oil, so the biggest consumer sets the price (in the near future, expect to see competition for oil resources with China) and most countries in Europe have a higher tax on fuel (the US is currently about 40.4 cents per gallon [18.4 cents per gallon federal, varying rates in states with an average of 22 cents per gallon] - compared to the UK, which has about a US$3.37 per gallon tax for "conventional unleaded petrol").
We really need to increase the gas tax, which would hopefully curb consumption--our main problem. But the US didn't develop like Europe. We developed when fuel was inexpensive and plentiful, and so our infrastructure requires large amounts of cheap fuel to continue to function. Soon, I hope to see more and more "new urbanist" development projects that advertise easy walking distance to shopping, employment opportunities, and mass transit instead of sprawling suburbs that advertise large lots, remote locations, and enormous McMansions that only the wealthy can afford.
As the most versatile nation in the world (arguably), it's really embarrassing that we haven't come up with a realistic alt-fuel. Well, I suppose we really have come up with several, but none of them are as profitable as gasoline, which I'm sure matters a lot to the people in power.
The state of the world makes me want to go live alone, nude in the wilderness.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 01:13 am (UTC)===(as a side-note, Divorce Your Car! : Ending the Love Affair with the Automobile goes into a bot of the things that seem to have led to the undercutting of so many public transportation systems..)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:48 pm (UTC)We feel entitled to hog up resources; and we expect it to come cheaply, too.
America could use a wake-up.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:54 am (UTC)For the rest of the world that's not sitting on an oil well, it's expensive.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 02:32 am (UTC)We really need to increase the gas tax, which would hopefully curb consumption--our main problem. But the US didn't develop like Europe. We developed when fuel was inexpensive and plentiful, and so our infrastructure requires large amounts of cheap fuel to continue to function. Soon, I hope to see more and more "new urbanist" development projects that advertise easy walking distance to shopping, employment opportunities, and mass transit instead of sprawling suburbs that advertise large lots, remote locations, and enormous McMansions that only the wealthy can afford.
*slowly kicks away soapbox*
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:25 pm (UTC)As the most versatile nation in the world (arguably), it's really embarrassing that we haven't come up with a realistic alt-fuel. Well, I suppose we really have come up with several, but none of them are as profitable as gasoline, which I'm sure matters a lot to the people in power.
The state of the world makes me want to go live alone, nude in the wilderness.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-29 09:05 am (UTC)