Why not eat horses?, part 2
Sep. 8th, 2006 01:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I thought I'd just posted about the horse slaughter issue, but apparently it's been a full year. The link in the previous sentence leads to my post about an email (from an animal protection organization I'm interested in), asking us all to lobby congress to make it illegal to slaughter horses for food. Apparently the House of Representatives has approved a bill to this effect.
My feeling is, if there are thousands of horses that need to be destroyed, why not sell the meat for food? One zoo director has become involved, as well, because the big cats that live in zoos eat mainly processed horse meat.
If you are against factory farming, or slaughterhouses, you must be against them for all animals. There is no important neurological difference between a cow and a horse that makes slaughter less humane for horses. Any opposition to horse slaughter comes from a sentimental attachment to one species over another, and is not logically consistent, and in my opinion, is basically indefensible.
There's also a xenophobic aspect to the bill: Americans don't eat horses, but the French and Japanese do. This is why the slaughter of cows will never be made illegal in the U.S.--We'd all starve! But since those weird foreigners are the dirty horse-eaters, why not ban horse slaughter?
I do not support factory farms, but I am in favor of humane slaughter. Treating animals like food does not bother me. Treating animals like some kind of inanimate raw material, like iron ore or something, that bothers me. Farm animals should be respected, their lives should not be misery, and we should expect meat to be expensive in exchange for treating our animals well.
My feeling is, if there are thousands of horses that need to be destroyed, why not sell the meat for food? One zoo director has become involved, as well, because the big cats that live in zoos eat mainly processed horse meat.
If you are against factory farming, or slaughterhouses, you must be against them for all animals. There is no important neurological difference between a cow and a horse that makes slaughter less humane for horses. Any opposition to horse slaughter comes from a sentimental attachment to one species over another, and is not logically consistent, and in my opinion, is basically indefensible.
There's also a xenophobic aspect to the bill: Americans don't eat horses, but the French and Japanese do. This is why the slaughter of cows will never be made illegal in the U.S.--We'd all starve! But since those weird foreigners are the dirty horse-eaters, why not ban horse slaughter?
I do not support factory farms, but I am in favor of humane slaughter. Treating animals like food does not bother me. Treating animals like some kind of inanimate raw material, like iron ore or something, that bothers me. Farm animals should be respected, their lives should not be misery, and we should expect meat to be expensive in exchange for treating our animals well.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:26 pm (UTC)It makes me think though. The goal of whale conservation is to get them to the point where they're not endangered. I'm sure some species are near or at that point now. Is it then ok to hunt them? I don't think so. I must be a hypocrite.
do you know this personally or something?
Date: 2006-09-08 07:33 pm (UTC)If it's a common thing, it's probably something done mostly in the South, closer to Belgium.
Re: do you know this personally or something?
Date: 2006-09-08 09:53 pm (UTC)Re: do you know this personally or something?
Date: 2006-09-09 04:56 am (UTC)Ik woonde 10 jaar in 't centrum van Amsterdam, en moet eerlijk toegeven dat ik het (zover ik me kan herinneren) nooit tegengekomen.
Re: do you know this personally or something?
Date: 2006-09-08 09:16 pm (UTC)Re: do you know this personally or something?
Date: 2006-11-30 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:42 pm (UTC)I have a great deal of respect for meat eaters that don't pretend that they aren't eating animals. (Come on Lisa, it's "lamb!" Not "a lamb.")
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:17 pm (UTC)Don't you know how it works here? If the animal is asthetically pleasing, than it can't be eaten.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:44 pm (UTC)Hell, I think insects are aesthetically pleasing, never mind cows and chickens!
Come on, eat the beauty!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:28 pm (UTC)http://urbpan.livejournal.com/55515.html
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:19 pm (UTC)I remember my father telling me that the prohibition against eating horse derives from attempts to drive out pre-Christian European religions, among whom the horse was a holy creature whose consumption was connected to various celebrations. He said that you could see where the holiness of horses and the ritual eating of horses had been by seeing where modern people are disgusted by the idea of eating them.
For myself, I won't eat primates, and I won't eat marine mammals,because the former are my family and the latter are family by adoption. There are other things I don't eat because I don't have the taste for them (most invertebrates). Somewhere I picked up the way to say it: "I do not know how to eat this thing." But marine mammals and primates, I refuse to learn how to eat them under any but the most dire circumstances.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:46 pm (UTC)Dogs and cats go to the pound; horses get slaughtered and shipped overseas.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:14 pm (UTC)this is not that reliable but
Date: 2006-09-08 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 09:56 pm (UTC)in MA we have a pound for unwanted horses, i'm not sure how many they can house at a time though.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 12:39 am (UTC)Nothing could be further from the truth, most horses at the slaughter house are young and in good health. Pregnant mares get sent to slaughter all the time. And yes, even wild mustangs are now being rounded up and shipped to slaughter.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 09:00 pm (UTC)horses are noble.
cows are ... well ... cows.
i'm VERY certain i've eaten horse. disguised as hamburger, in school. i think we even noted the improvement in taste over the crappy cow meat they served ;P
on a proper working farm, well, nothing is wasted. your ferrets/fitch that are too old or injured to rat/rabbit anymore? stew pot. too many boy goats? off to the stew with them. old bessy dried up and can't produce no more? off to the grill.
even the adorable llamas and alpacas ... though they produce nifty fur for a long long time after their peak breeding years, they still don't live that long. you fed, you eat'em.
so horses? well, IF they HAVE to kill'em. sure. sell'em for food, even for tigers and lions if not people. the think though is, do they HAVE to kill them, especially the wild ones.
and like the modern man song (http://www.modernman3.com), roadkill is the way to go if you really want ethical, especially from the scavenging/reuse mindset :)
#
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:39 pm (UTC)the debate on the subject in
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:44 pm (UTC)i'll go out and shoot a moose before i get hungry enough to eat anything coughed up by the meat industry.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:56 pm (UTC)btw - that pet_debate thread was interesting. it's a wonder your head didn't explode.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:58 pm (UTC)i think my head did explode a little bit. some people seem not to understand the concept of 'debate.'
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:45 pm (UTC)thanks!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:46 pm (UTC)/tasteless
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:55 pm (UTC)sorry.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 07:21 pm (UTC)I am all for it. at the end of the day if we did not have a way of moving on old horses then we would be Losing a lot of money, time and fieldspace. Its no real difference to cattle, sheep, goats and the other species we eat. People are geting rather upset about this one as horses are a more attractive species.
At the end of the day, if it is done humanely then I have no huge problem with culling horses - I think I would rather eat horsemeat than chicken. Personal opinion, of course
And on a practical view - so many zoos in the UK and abroad rely on cheap horsemeat to feed their animals. I believe in some species it is even more nutritionally sound than beef. A lot of animal organisations would suffer without this source of meat.
My 2 Cents
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:31 pm (UTC)I think the power of cultural and social norms is amazing.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 08:44 pm (UTC)Having done a project at the local zoo with some of the big cats, I concur that this is very true. I don't know what zoos would do if horsemeat were banned from the market. Beef seems far too expensive an alternative.
Good post; I agree with your points. Hopefully this bill won't get through the senate.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-09 12:09 am (UTC)Every day I can visit a dozen horse rescue sites and see horses they rescued that have been neglected, starved, what have you. Then they have the "feedlot rescues", which are horses they buy from the killer buyers, usually right as their herd is being loaded up to be shipped to slaughter. They always say "we can't save them all".
So what the hell do they think will happen when there is no slaughter? If they can't save them all now, do they think all the excess horses will magically disappear once the ban takes effect?
Too many idiot politicians voted on emotions (which I guess is always the case) rather than logic.
I blame the showing industry for creating so many unwanted horses - it's not unheard of for a person who shows to buy a new horse every year because they don't want to take the time and effort to get one horse to the higher levels - it's so much easier to buy one ready made. Ugh.