Entry tags:
Why not eat horses?, part 2
I thought I'd just posted about the horse slaughter issue, but apparently it's been a full year. The link in the previous sentence leads to my post about an email (from an animal protection organization I'm interested in), asking us all to lobby congress to make it illegal to slaughter horses for food. Apparently the House of Representatives has approved a bill to this effect.
My feeling is, if there are thousands of horses that need to be destroyed, why not sell the meat for food? One zoo director has become involved, as well, because the big cats that live in zoos eat mainly processed horse meat.
If you are against factory farming, or slaughterhouses, you must be against them for all animals. There is no important neurological difference between a cow and a horse that makes slaughter less humane for horses. Any opposition to horse slaughter comes from a sentimental attachment to one species over another, and is not logically consistent, and in my opinion, is basically indefensible.
There's also a xenophobic aspect to the bill: Americans don't eat horses, but the French and Japanese do. This is why the slaughter of cows will never be made illegal in the U.S.--We'd all starve! But since those weird foreigners are the dirty horse-eaters, why not ban horse slaughter?
I do not support factory farms, but I am in favor of humane slaughter. Treating animals like food does not bother me. Treating animals like some kind of inanimate raw material, like iron ore or something, that bothers me. Farm animals should be respected, their lives should not be misery, and we should expect meat to be expensive in exchange for treating our animals well.
My feeling is, if there are thousands of horses that need to be destroyed, why not sell the meat for food? One zoo director has become involved, as well, because the big cats that live in zoos eat mainly processed horse meat.
If you are against factory farming, or slaughterhouses, you must be against them for all animals. There is no important neurological difference between a cow and a horse that makes slaughter less humane for horses. Any opposition to horse slaughter comes from a sentimental attachment to one species over another, and is not logically consistent, and in my opinion, is basically indefensible.
There's also a xenophobic aspect to the bill: Americans don't eat horses, but the French and Japanese do. This is why the slaughter of cows will never be made illegal in the U.S.--We'd all starve! But since those weird foreigners are the dirty horse-eaters, why not ban horse slaughter?
I do not support factory farms, but I am in favor of humane slaughter. Treating animals like food does not bother me. Treating animals like some kind of inanimate raw material, like iron ore or something, that bothers me. Farm animals should be respected, their lives should not be misery, and we should expect meat to be expensive in exchange for treating our animals well.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
do you know this personally or something?
Re: do you know this personally or something?
Re: do you know this personally or something?
Re: do you know this personally or something?
Re: do you know this personally or something?
(Anonymous) - 2006-11-30 00:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Don't you know how it works here? If the animal is asthetically pleasing, than it can't be eaten.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I remember my father telling me that the prohibition against eating horse derives from attempts to drive out pre-Christian European religions, among whom the horse was a holy creature whose consumption was connected to various celebrations. He said that you could see where the holiness of horses and the ritual eating of horses had been by seeing where modern people are disgusted by the idea of eating them.
For myself, I won't eat primates, and I won't eat marine mammals,because the former are my family and the latter are family by adoption. There are other things I don't eat because I don't have the taste for them (most invertebrates). Somewhere I picked up the way to say it: "I do not know how to eat this thing." But marine mammals and primates, I refuse to learn how to eat them under any but the most dire circumstances.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
this is not that reliable but
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2006-11-30 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
the debate on the subject in
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I am all for it. at the end of the day if we did not have a way of moving on old horses then we would be Losing a lot of money, time and fieldspace. Its no real difference to cattle, sheep, goats and the other species we eat. People are geting rather upset about this one as horses are a more attractive species.
At the end of the day, if it is done humanely then I have no huge problem with culling horses - I think I would rather eat horsemeat than chicken. Personal opinion, of course
And on a practical view - so many zoos in the UK and abroad rely on cheap horsemeat to feed their animals. I believe in some species it is even more nutritionally sound than beef. A lot of animal organisations would suffer without this source of meat.
My 2 Cents
no subject
I think the power of cultural and social norms is amazing.
no subject
Having done a project at the local zoo with some of the big cats, I concur that this is very true. I don't know what zoos would do if horsemeat were banned from the market. Beef seems far too expensive an alternative.
Good post; I agree with your points. Hopefully this bill won't get through the senate.
no subject
Every day I can visit a dozen horse rescue sites and see horses they rescued that have been neglected, starved, what have you. Then they have the "feedlot rescues", which are horses they buy from the killer buyers, usually right as their herd is being loaded up to be shipped to slaughter. They always say "we can't save them all".
So what the hell do they think will happen when there is no slaughter? If they can't save them all now, do they think all the excess horses will magically disappear once the ban takes effect?
Too many idiot politicians voted on emotions (which I guess is always the case) rather than logic.
I blame the showing industry for creating so many unwanted horses - it's not unheard of for a person who shows to buy a new horse every year because they don't want to take the time and effort to get one horse to the higher levels - it's so much easier to buy one ready made. Ugh.