Of course, of course
Aug. 21st, 2007 07:46 pmYesterday's zebra post, all of three sentences, took way too much effort. I got stuck on wanting to refer to the Grevy's zebra as the largest horse. I knew that if I did that, it would cause some discomfort among certain of my readers. But all living equids (ugh, that's so unsatisfying) are not only in the same Family (the way that foxes and dholes are in the dog Family) but they are in the same Genus (the way that wolves and coyotes are in the same genus as domestic dogs). So donkeys, domestic horses, wild asses, and zebras are all in Genus Equus, and there should be a single word to refer to them--and there is, it's Equid. No one gets upset when you refer to lions and jaguars and pumas and snow leopards as "cats."
It's complicated, and it has to do with the great closeness humans feel for domestic horses. They are to be elevated above all others in their Genus, the lowly asses and burros. And just look at the brouhaha that ensues when you suggest that they are as edible as cows.
There's also the complication of taxonomic correctness, the itchy brows that people get when you call a beetle a "bug" or a gorilla a "monkey." There's really no danger in calling a non-hemipteran a "bug" or calling a great ape a "monkey." (The animals that are "correctly" called monkeys are in two widely divergent groups that really have no business sharing a name. Why should a marmoset and a mandrill get the same common name and not share it with a siamang or a sifaka?) Calling a whale a "fish" is more egregious, as it betrays an ignorance of the animal's essence, and serves to unjustly distance the creature from its kinship to us.
I reserve the right to call a fox a "dog," an ocelot a "cat," and a zebra a "horse." To resist is to succumb to arbitrary convention, my least favorite convention.
It's complicated, and it has to do with the great closeness humans feel for domestic horses. They are to be elevated above all others in their Genus, the lowly asses and burros. And just look at the brouhaha that ensues when you suggest that they are as edible as cows.
There's also the complication of taxonomic correctness, the itchy brows that people get when you call a beetle a "bug" or a gorilla a "monkey." There's really no danger in calling a non-hemipteran a "bug" or calling a great ape a "monkey." (The animals that are "correctly" called monkeys are in two widely divergent groups that really have no business sharing a name. Why should a marmoset and a mandrill get the same common name and not share it with a siamang or a sifaka?) Calling a whale a "fish" is more egregious, as it betrays an ignorance of the animal's essence, and serves to unjustly distance the creature from its kinship to us.
I reserve the right to call a fox a "dog," an ocelot a "cat," and a zebra a "horse." To resist is to succumb to arbitrary convention, my least favorite convention.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 12:23 am (UTC)I'm an entomologist and I call insects generally bugs... but usually I get a little twinge about it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 12:30 am (UTC)The ape/monkey one does bother me, personally. I know that tamarins and marmosets are not really 'monkeys', but they're less well-known, in general, while everyone knows what a gorilla is.
A lot of it isn't necessarily about taxonomy as it is image. Make any sense?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 12:57 am (UTC)i seem to recall looking up bite statistics when i had ferts (carpet sharks) that cattle (cow), and horse were very much in the top 5, even higher than dog and cat, and ferrets weren't even on the list. so much for ferrets are baby killers/etc :)
course, when i went back to find that list recently (us agricultural list?) i couldn't find it.
horse feathers i say! :) "what? they're birds now?"
#
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:07 am (UTC)Once when I was grooming on of the 'ponies' at Children's Zoo (they are techinally ponies, but the size of smallish horses) and was picking their back hooves, so I was facing his rear. He did little reach over and mouthed my boob! I almost went to HR! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:04 am (UTC)Not that the average member of the general public is going to get itself into a place where mistaking a zebra for a domestic animal will cause a problem. (There was, however, a little girl way past the barrier fence with her hands through the enclosure fence at Serengeti crossing yesterday...)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:37 am (UTC)We get to pet the cats during knockdowns. Snow leopards are the softest. :)
Snow leopards
Date: 2007-08-23 12:18 am (UTC)Re: Snow leopards
Date: 2007-08-23 12:25 am (UTC)Re: Snow leopards
Date: 2007-08-23 10:18 am (UTC)regarding the nomenclature of academic snobbery
Date: 2007-08-22 01:07 am (UTC)Re: regarding the nomenclature of academic snobbery
Date: 2007-08-22 01:10 am (UTC)Re: regarding the nomenclature of academic snobbery
Date: 2007-08-22 02:46 pm (UTC)Re: regarding the nomenclature of academic snobbery
Date: 2007-08-22 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:39 am (UTC)I'm also insistent on referring to humans as one species of ape.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:12 am (UTC)Rhinos=Equids?
Date: 2007-08-22 03:14 am (UTC)My boyfriend's mom called a nephew's iguana "the bug". One day we got a frantic phone call, "THE BUG! The bug is dead! The boy is crying all the time now."
Rhinos =/= equids
Date: 2007-08-24 05:25 pm (UTC)And hey, you're right, a tapir did bite someone's arm off!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-28 03:39 pm (UTC)I've heard zebra is quite tasty.