And it comes out
Jan. 18th, 2008 05:59 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Sorry I jumped to blame the victim, but it appears I was right.
Okay, so the wall was four feet shorter than the AZA recommendations state. It still took 60 years for someone to be obnoxious enough to annoy the tiger into jumping out.
Here's where the zoo is really culpable: these three guys apparently drunkenly roamed the zoo taunting animals conspicuously enough for zoo guests to report it, for some amount of time, without security throwing them out. But once again, it was Christmas day, and I imagine they were short staffed.
When someone dies for a stupid reason, there's enough blame to go around for everyone.
Okay, so the wall was four feet shorter than the AZA recommendations state. It still took 60 years for someone to be obnoxious enough to annoy the tiger into jumping out.
Here's where the zoo is really culpable: these three guys apparently drunkenly roamed the zoo taunting animals conspicuously enough for zoo guests to report it, for some amount of time, without security throwing them out. But once again, it was Christmas day, and I imagine they were short staffed.
When someone dies for a stupid reason, there's enough blame to go around for everyone.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-18 09:06 pm (UTC)I agree with you that it is foolish to think no one will tease the animals.
Taking satisfaction in his death is creepy. And sin_agua, if the "death" part of your equation was correct, there would be far, far fewer people walking this planet.
If I did take any satisfaction, it was only momentary, and I was speaking a bit emotionally this morning, as I said. But I still feel more sympathy for the tiger than the kid. As for the equation, well...I've seen a lot of stupid people (myself included) miss out on getting themselves killed simply by dumb luck. So yeah, I guess that's why there's still so many of us around. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 01:58 am (UTC)