My favorite thing about my blog is the comments. I'm proud that I've cultivated a readership that is intelligent, thoughtful, passionate, reasonable, tolerant, irreverent, knowledgeable, and funny. I'm very happy to belong to a community of adults who have similar interests and different opinions, and the ability to express them with insight, humor, and respect. People who leave because they're offended, well, that's too bad. People who leave because they're bored, well, that's my bad.
So then, which is more controversial: people eating cats, or cats eating people?
So then, which is more controversial: people eating cats, or cats eating people?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 01:54 am (UTC)*college football chants* FOOT-AGE! FOOT-AGE! FOOT-AGE!
(I must part of your flist who are in really bad taste.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 02:06 am (UTC)I hope I never become that old lady. Perhaps I've just jinxed myself...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 02:20 am (UTC)I think more controversy arises from cats eating people. When people eat cats, it's generally in a setting of most people approving or most people disapproving. But look at a situation like in California, where protected cougars attack people, and those people aren't allowed to carry weapons to protect themselves. That's controversial. You can hear all kinds of arguments around that one.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 02:23 am (UTC)I mean, as long as you're not eating my kitty. And as long as she's not eating me.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:08 am (UTC)They may be sentient, and smart, but their moral systems are probably simpler than ours. They can't debate whether or not eating people is wrong and then go do it anyway. Humans can always debate that about eating any kind of meat. So since humans can see both sides of the issue, and then go with one side, that is more worthy of controversy: there is a chance (we will never truly know) that cats can't even ponder that it is an option NOT to eat the corpse on the floor/person in the zoo, and that that choice might be better or worse than eating it.
Can cats 'know' better? No, probably. Can humans? Yes, probably. So their conscious decision to do so is more debate-able...therefore more controversial.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:10 am (UTC)(domestic) Cats are the only non-endangered species I won't eat. But I don't think areas where cat is part of the cuisine should take it off the menu.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:18 am (UTC)Yeah, what a great idea. Let's get drunk and go taunt big animals at the zoo.
Anybody who owns a house cat can tell you its amazing the distances that cats can jump or climb, when they really want to. My cat has climbed up the fridge sans use of the counter, for example.
Proof of Darwinism at its finest... and further evidence that even a tiger born and raised in captivity never loses its wild instincts.
Of course, if you want a Darwin Award waiting to happen, head over to Thailand, where they have a place you can get close up with tigers, called Tiger Temple, or Wat Pha Luang Ta Bua. (I didn't make it there myself when I was in Bangkok, although the idea certainly interested me. What does that say about me? LOL).
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:50 am (UTC)Cats eating people, because I'm more likely to have nightmares about that tonight than me eating cat. I'm pretty sure that's not something I would do, even if I were really, really hungry.
By the way, the local stray cat greeted me this morning by running away from me. They're so cuuuuuuuuuuuute!
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:59 am (UTC)People eating cats, probably. Cats eating people is, well, you know, that happens. Cats don't think about it like we do. They think about it like cats think about it. Us, however, well, if we do it then we're shifting some big social norm we've created over the years.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 05:39 am (UTC)But really, asking which is worse is like asking which one is funnier, a mexican making jokes about white people, or a white person making jokes about mexicans; the perceived status difference is too high.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 06:22 am (UTC)I don't like the notion of people eating "companion animals." For that reason. I expect if they are feral, then they are wild. . . and my only caveat for eating something with a face that can feel fear and pain is that we DON'T cause them fear and pain in our pursuit of their meat.
I think vegetarians have the karmic moral high ground. I also don't think it's "wrong" to kill an animal for it's meat. For our vanity/fashion? No, bad.
I'm not sure that answers your question.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 06:22 am (UTC)A cat eats you, people are like, eh, shouldn't have been drunk in the tiger cage.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:22 am (UTC)Nope. Won't do it. you can't make me.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 10:34 am (UTC)I have no problem with cats (I assume you mean Big Cats) eating people, as it's part of their ordinary hunting behaviour in the wild. Humans eating cats I cannot condone as either a Vegetarian or a Naturalist- we have a choice the cats do not have. Australia has a massive feral cat problem- currently they are shot or baited- as long as it's quick, I suppose, although I'm not happy about that either ideally there should be a massive, continent wide Mandatory Feline Sterilization Program- remember, it's not the feral animal's fault that it is feral, but ours for introducing them...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 03:27 pm (UTC)~Flaneuse in DC
Charismatic megafauness
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 04:54 pm (UTC)my answer is:
People eating dogs, especially in North America where people not only do crazy unnecessary things, but they also like to discuss people doing crazy unnecessary things and come up with moral decrees about such things.
I like you too, and your partner and dogs are nice too.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 04:50 pm (UTC)Now, rich man dining on 'cat' because he heard it was good, or he's always wanted to eat fluffy? or a cat attacking a person with the intention of killing and eating? ... scary.
On these notes.. my cat seems to have decided my hair is in the same family species as a mouse. She was chomping enthusuastically on my hair this morning when I woke up, and lashed a paw out, clawfully when I tried to pull it out of her grasp. Hmm..
no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 08:25 pm (UTC)I do have a pet peeve about whenever a news story has something to do with both animals and people dying- say there's a story about a pet store burning to the ground and all the pets and all the pet store workers are trapped inside. There's *always* someone out there who thinks he or she is being clever by saying something along the lines of "Oh, I don't care about the people trapped inside but I feel sorry for all those parakeets! Omg!"
I don't understand why there are so many people out there who profess to love all animals but seem to hate all people. Doesn't seem like a warm-hearted enough person to be able to love any animals, either.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 01:44 pm (UTC)