urbpan: (Default)
[personal profile] urbpan


A very promising and valuable franchise is somehow sadly mishandled, and good ideas are allowed to become a very average horror movie. The movie's first misfire happens during the opening credits, when all the characters from the previous sequel, except Ripley, are killed off. Soon enough an interesting premise develops: Ripley is trapped in a prison colony with collection of homicidal maniac religious fanatics--and The Alien. Almost as soon as interesting characters are developed, they become monster-fodder. Once the shock has worn off, the viewers are left with less interesting minor characters, on whom no sympathy can be wasted, and who are knocked off one by one in humdrum sequence. Most disappointing is the corruption of Giger's Alien, who is rendered in unconvincing CGI, resulting in a monster that invites comparison to "Anaconda." The sudden and baffling last act appearance of the designer of the "Bishop" android heralds the general unraveling of the story. Finally, whoever decided to muddy the Alien milieu with religious symbolism (especially evident in Ripley's ludicrous chest-bursting plunge into the lava of mount doom--or is it the foundry that the Terminator is destroyed in?) should get out of sci-fi and back into Catholic school. The alternate version seems to improve some of the problems, and exchanges a bad chest-burst dog puppet for a silly-looking fake ox carcass. Once again, the plot is essentially the same as "The Thing from Another World." ("Who Goes There?")
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 04:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios