urbpan: (Default)
[personal profile] urbpan
People who love Nature (in my most optimistic moments I imagine that this includes a majority of people) of course like to be surrounded by it. Often nature lovers are repelled by cities, and take effort to instead live in the countryside or surrounded by wilderness.

But living outside of the city causes a greater environmental impact: Trees must be cut down, roads must be built, and resources are sent out through diffuse networks. Rural people use more energy heating and cooling their homes, getting to and from work as well as running simple errands. As the population increases, whole non-urban communities are created, paving over wilderness and paving the way for more cars, more houses, more development.

In order to live where you are surrounded by natural beauty, one must participate in a system (development of rural areas) that is slowly and surely destroying that beauty.

Discuss.

Date: 2005-08-01 12:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/purplebunnie_/
Disagreement on a personal level.

It's nearly impossible to "develop" the lavas in N.Shasta Co. where I grew up. 10 Acres of woods, wood stove, cutting only dead or nearly dead trees with plenty of wood leftover for the winter, raising you own food...

It's possible to live comfortably within nature without making a noticable impact... most people are just flat out too lazy to reap the rewards of such.

Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 9th, 2025 08:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios