urbpan: (I LOVE DOGS)
[personal profile] urbpan


I've been sitting on this hermaphrodite chicken story for a while, and then I heard them talking about it on NPR. I just wanted to use my tag again.

I didn't eat any whale while I was in Greenland, though I saw it for sale. If I'd known it was so forbidden in the US I might have, just for the experience. There they eat the non-endangered Minke whale. If you wanted some meat from an endangered Sei whale, then you could have gone to HUMP, a sushi restaurant in L.A. until recently, but then the Feds shut them down for selling horse and whale meat. (For the record: I am against selling endangered whale meat, very much FOR selling horse meat.)

HEY look at the cool frog!

Date: 2010-03-12 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urbpan.livejournal.com
I'm not in favor of it because it makes industrial or agricultural sense (in general I think livestock operations should be much smaller) but because I think the law prohibiting it is absurd. Click my "horses as meat" tag for previous discussions (where some VERY passionate horse lovers take me to task) but in short, I don't think that horses deserve special status. I feel the same way about cats, and have taken some heat for that, too.

When they round up hundreds of feral horses, I think meat production should be an option. Starting a new meat production facility with captive horses wouldn't make much sense.

Date: 2010-03-12 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyonesse.livejournal.com
huh. i think that if it doesn't make industrial or economic sense, there's no point in adding it to this country's massively oversized and ill-formed agriculture. particularly in the case of large animals such as horses, which are a whole lot more dangerous to handle than kittens, and also make awesome vectors for food-borne illnesses.

when they round up hundreds of feral horses, they do not have adequate testing or refrigeration facilities to ensure the safety of the food supply on hand. iirc there's one plant in the usa that has any facilities for processing horsemeat, and i strongly suspect they prefer to start with animals that are well-nourished, relatively parasite-free, and trained to lead at least. of which there are plenty at auction at present for a song (whether for meat or other purposes, even), and i don't think they'd welcome another, even-less-well-managed supply.

Date: 2010-03-12 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urbpan.livejournal.com
Fair enough, but the processing was already happening and was made illegal, which is silly. It wasn't made illegal because of the difficulty or risk involved, but on a solely sentimental basis.

Date: 2010-03-12 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyonesse.livejournal.com
sure, and the cowboy used to be a vital part of our food supply chain too. nostalgia for the technology of a bygone era is no reason to support an impractical new system to replace something that's already long gone and not much missed.

Date: 2010-03-12 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urbpan.livejournal.com
Still the problem of what to do with those horse carcasses.

Date: 2010-03-12 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyonesse.livejournal.com
i thought earth-movers and lime were standard?

Date: 2010-03-12 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyonesse.livejournal.com
though in fact, seeing as how active the local (by which i mean lj) taxidermy-art communities are, i'm not at all uncertain it would be unprofitable for some taxidermy types to be on hand to recover interesting/popular bits (skulls, say). but that would take some organizing, and you still need the lime pits.

Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 09:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios