Maybe not.
Mar. 13th, 2006 12:37 pmFrom
literaryagents (not directed toward me--I'm only lurking there so far):
No publishing company will want to publish something that can be got for free by anyone who knows how to use a search engine.
I don't know that this is 100% true, but I can see potential problems down the line.
No publishing company will want to publish something that can be got for free by anyone who knows how to use a search engine.
I don't know that this is 100% true, but I can see potential problems down the line.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-13 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-13 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-13 06:48 pm (UTC)Two words: Health column.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-13 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 04:44 am (UTC)In Urbpan's case, I've never doubted anything he's written, because I know he writes with authority, and even if he pulled information of the internet, he'd do it with good judgment.
Actually, the last time I doubt him on anything involving nature was probably 18 years ago when we we're at some Connecticut beach and he started eating the rose hips. Apparently they're edible and tasty.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 12:36 pm (UTC)Yeah, I think having a resource handy is a bonus for some people. Wifi isn't so prevalent that you can take your laptop with you on hikes.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-13 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 12:04 am (UTC)Riiiiight...
I see field guide books being published all the time. Not a lot of people are going to want to carry around a wireless computer all the time when they are exploring.
But I would suggest making your book unique, not just in subject, but in style, too. These days consumers are looking for style and personality, along with their facts.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 07:36 am (UTC)Of course you're pretty screwed on the southwest, but we don't read books anyway.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:27 pm (UTC)I think a big part of what makes the project interesting is that there is so little available in our very long winter. It's forced me to make some interesting choices.
A global (or even national) urban nature field guide would be impossible and meaningless. There is at least one available (a Peterson's first guide--for kids) but it's quite thin. Maybe not impossible and meaningless, that was flip, but it wouldn't cover much. The logical thing to do (if I wanted to do an urban field guide) would be to do a northeast version, since more of the region is urban than any other (it could cover the triangle from Chicago to DC to Boston) and there is a bigger market covered than any other ecological region.
In other words, I'm not looking to cover everything, I'm looking to report on what I know and where I'm at. My fantasy would be to travel from city to city writing and getting expense accounts and such.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:32 pm (UTC)Maybe I should see if powells wants to expand?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:33 pm (UTC)