Maybe not.
Mar. 13th, 2006 12:37 pmFrom
literaryagents (not directed toward me--I'm only lurking there so far):
No publishing company will want to publish something that can be got for free by anyone who knows how to use a search engine.
I don't know that this is 100% true, but I can see potential problems down the line.
No publishing company will want to publish something that can be got for free by anyone who knows how to use a search engine.
I don't know that this is 100% true, but I can see potential problems down the line.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-14 07:36 am (UTC)Of course you're pretty screwed on the southwest, but we don't read books anyway.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:27 pm (UTC)I think a big part of what makes the project interesting is that there is so little available in our very long winter. It's forced me to make some interesting choices.
A global (or even national) urban nature field guide would be impossible and meaningless. There is at least one available (a Peterson's first guide--for kids) but it's quite thin. Maybe not impossible and meaningless, that was flip, but it wouldn't cover much. The logical thing to do (if I wanted to do an urban field guide) would be to do a northeast version, since more of the region is urban than any other (it could cover the triangle from Chicago to DC to Boston) and there is a bigger market covered than any other ecological region.
In other words, I'm not looking to cover everything, I'm looking to report on what I know and where I'm at. My fantasy would be to travel from city to city writing and getting expense accounts and such.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:32 pm (UTC)Maybe I should see if powells wants to expand?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-15 09:33 pm (UTC)