Beating a delicious horse
Feb. 10th, 2007 04:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I know I've brought up this subject many times before, but it has come to my attention (to my email box, in fact) that Time Magazine has now written an article on it. I was considering, earlier today, to bring up the general subject of the human uses of animals, but I'll table that for a little later.
In short, why are horses on the short list of domestic animals that Americans don't eat? (And in fact there are laws against eating horses in some states.) The last paragraph of the article sums it up pretty neatly:
It's not that I don't think killing horses is cruel. It's just that I think killing chickens, pigs, sheep and cows is equally bad. Morality based on aesthetics is pretty shallow. In fact, the only weird part about eating horse was that, unlike with bacon or rib eye, we kept picturing the animal, which was kind of gross. Nonetheless, until I decide to stop my less-than-noble practice of eating other animals, I've got little choice but to order up some more horse.
(Joel Stein is the author of this article.)
I pretty much agree. While I don't eat meat, unless it comes from an animal whose life and care I knew well (I eat pork sausage from my farm), I don't see any problem with eating horse--or rabbit, or guinea pig, or whatever. Animals are animals, and they all are capable of suffering. No domestic mammal is hurt more or less from a trip to the slaughterhouse, or from a life in a stall, pen, or cage.
In short, why are horses on the short list of domestic animals that Americans don't eat? (And in fact there are laws against eating horses in some states.) The last paragraph of the article sums it up pretty neatly:
It's not that I don't think killing horses is cruel. It's just that I think killing chickens, pigs, sheep and cows is equally bad. Morality based on aesthetics is pretty shallow. In fact, the only weird part about eating horse was that, unlike with bacon or rib eye, we kept picturing the animal, which was kind of gross. Nonetheless, until I decide to stop my less-than-noble practice of eating other animals, I've got little choice but to order up some more horse.
(Joel Stein is the author of this article.)
I pretty much agree. While I don't eat meat, unless it comes from an animal whose life and care I knew well (I eat pork sausage from my farm), I don't see any problem with eating horse--or rabbit, or guinea pig, or whatever. Animals are animals, and they all are capable of suffering. No domestic mammal is hurt more or less from a trip to the slaughterhouse, or from a life in a stall, pen, or cage.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-10 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 01:06 pm (UTC)I had oversimplified it to be about Americans' belief that food is sterile, and the association with insects in food with contamination.
One day while working in a cafe I discovered that a yellow jacket had crawled into a flavor syrup bottle nozzle and died. I had to make a judgment about whether the syrup was contaminated or not. Then I realized that we also had honey...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-10 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-10 10:01 pm (UTC)I suppose you could say common sense is bracing itself against society again. While the arguments for protecting one animal and eating another fall apart in the common sense view sans emotional attachment, society responds by affirming its stance with (sometimes) irrational arguments. I don't always find them irrational, though, and I think there's a lot to be said for the different kinds of domestication we've done over the millenia. The purpose is key. Back when I still ate meat, I don't think I could ever have brought myself to eat horse, dog, cat, or parakeet. I based my deicision for vegetarianism on more reasons than just suffering (or else I'd have to be vegan in order to remain consistent in my logic). Having been a vegetarian for more than 6 years now, I'd have to say that even if suffering was eliminated, I don't think I could ever eat another animal again, even if their life was full.
Something you might find interesting, as I did when I first started making decisions about what I ate, is a sort of essay by Carol J. Adams, a feminist author. I read it 6 years ago in a Religion and Ethics class my freshman year of college:
Adams, Carol J. 1993. "Feeding on Grace: Institutional Violence, Christianity, and Vegetarianism," from C. Pinches and J. McDaniel, eds., Good News for Animals?, Orbis, 1993, pp. 142-159. (Couldn't find it online, sorry, but it's good enough to seek out).
no subject
Date: 2007-02-10 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 02:22 pm (UTC)these guys got a song for everything!
#
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 02:11 am (UTC)what's the difference between fresh road kill, and store bought meat? the money ;) on a working farm, with working animals, if they aren't working, they get eaten, esp in the "good old days". these days, we have SO MUCH FOOD, that i doubt farmer johnboy eats his plow horse when he has other choices. sentiment? maybe. back in the day? food was more dear i expect.
it amuses me that with SO many insects, and an RDA allotment for how many pounds a year you're allowed to eat as a byproduct of eating veggies, that we don't eat more. better: some insects eat meat. they love it. so do birds, squirrels, deer, and other "vegetarian" animals. trace minerals, salts, stuff.
so. well. food. comes from life, from materials from a star (for the most part), powered by sunlight (more or less). i'd say we are star stuff, but me? i'm made of meat. i live in my box.
#
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 04:02 am (UTC)i've seen a "murder" of crows assault some squirrels and eat them alive, yow. birds.
i'm told of a burrow/ass that routinely kills intruder dogs on the property and eats them. starting with the head/brains. whoa.
mammals drop and die in the woods all the time. finding an intact skeleton is rare. the other animals consider it a source of minerals :) esp antlers. rodents love'm.
#
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 01:15 pm (UTC)People are always surprised when turkeys and chickens eat vertebrate prey--bugs are fair game, but when a chicken I raised stole dead mice from the bucket to run away and eat them, that freaked people out. Meat is meat.
Most birds, even--especially--songbirds are carnivorous predators. Chickadees and robins eat animals (little ones) whenever they can.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 02:18 pm (UTC)course, it freaked a vegan friend of mine out to learn what suet IS.
hah.
in the theme of eating the tasty animals: (stolen from elsewhere)
o there's no wrong way to eat a rhesus
o neko wafers. ^..^
#
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 08:01 pm (UTC)Well, money, yes, but also road kill is very often terribly bruised, or the stomach might have ruptured, or other interesting stuff that makes it difficult to get to the plate in a tasty way. I have, by the way, eaten a deer I ran over, and I think next time I'll leave it for the vultures and flies.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 06:40 am (UTC)Clever wrap up. But by that logic, he's left himself no choice but to grill some golden retriever as well. (Which I hear the Chinese have no problem with: some dogs are "pets" and some are "dinner.")
I think it's okay to raise animals for food. I don't think it's okay to make them suffer psychological or physical stress, or pain/fear along the way, no matter their looks or their intelligence or lack thereof -- because that makes us look like cruel, heartless, self-obsessed megalomaniacs. Which we are, but it's good to keep that to civilized limit when we have the choice. I'm not sure why compassion, empathy, and human kidness is held in such low regard in these matters.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 09:34 pm (UTC)(I personally think that if humans have a "soul" -- which I'm not convinced of, I simply don't know -- then there's no reason animals don't either. I don't think intelligence or self-awareness is the defining factor.)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-12 03:25 am (UTC)Obviously it's a person by person thang. :-)
Frankly, though, I'd much rather eat meat that had been well treated and well loved and humanely/kindly/personally slaughtered by "loving" hands than what we get with factory farming conveyor belt methods.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 02:21 pm (UTC)http://www.modernman3.com/lyric_dog.htm
#
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 01:47 pm (UTC)In Dutch there are different names for "head", "mouth" and "leg" when referring to animals or humans. I find it interesting that horses are the exception to this - their head, mouth and leg is referred to by the human term. They have a symbolism and regalness in society.
But, then again, you can easily buy horse meat here - mostly imported from Spain.