urbpan: (Soylent Screen!)
[personal profile] urbpan
In this installment I review Stephen King's Dreamcatcher, which borrows from many other stories, but innovates by having the main characters be telepathic, and by moving the scariest monster scene into the bathroom. I innovate by using the word "assweasel." (In the movie they use a slightly more offensive word.)

Read it at Blood Blade and Thruster!

Date: 2007-09-25 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morgi.livejournal.com
What's the promotional tagline, "Just when you thought it was safe to take a dump?"

Date: 2007-09-25 03:46 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-09-25 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aemiis-zoo.livejournal.com
Have you seen Stephen King's "Desperation:. Mark bought it for me from the $5.50 bin at Wal-Mart and I wasn't impressed. I am curious as to your thoughts on it (if you have seen it).

Date: 2007-09-25 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brush-rat.livejournal.com
Whooof. In the waaaay discount bin already? I read the book and was interested in seeing the movie but it just slipped by which is never a good sign.

Date: 2007-09-25 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aemiis-zoo.livejournal.com
Did you like the book?

Date: 2007-09-25 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brush-rat.livejournal.com
I did, although some of that was due to it being the rare book set in Nevada that wasn't set in Las Vegas. Very creepy, very disturbing , particularly in the beginning when it's dealing with the small town cop, with absolute authority within his tiny little dominion. It kind of falls apart in the end when the supernatural baddy is revealed, but a good read. Oddly enough, he wrote the story twice, the second time as Bachman using a lot of the same names and gimmicks but in a completely different setting.

Date: 2007-09-25 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aemiis-zoo.livejournal.com
Hmmm...odd...I wonder why he felt the need to write the same story twice?

*ponder*

Date: 2007-09-25 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] urbpan.livejournal.com
I have not seen it. Apparently it was made for TV. I like Ron Perlman, and it sounds like he was pretty good in it. The netflix members reviews are mostly people who had read the book and were very very disappointed with the adaptation.

I haven't read it, so I might like it more than others.
From: [identity profile] aemiis-zoo.livejournal.com
I didn't read the book either, and I still didn't like it. It was just odd. It had some sort of pseudo-religious theme, kind of like "The Stand", but without its redeeming qualities.

Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 6th, 2026 09:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios