Technostupidity
Oct. 11th, 2004 03:29 pmI now have Gmail, which I'm sure will make my life richer and more fulfilling, once I'm able to use it. It seems that our computer, which seemed new and state of the art oh so recently, doesn't have the oomph. (these technical terms give me a headache.) Apparently, the solution is to buy a 140 dollar doodad that increases our computer's smarts. I'm not sure if we are jumping through this particular hoop because we use a Mac (which seems to be the computer equivalent of being a vegetarian: sure you feel better, but you can't get 90% of what everyone else is having), or if it's just part of the "put a couple hundred bucks into new computer crap" program that the computer industry is running. (Which, I assume, is borrowed from the very successful "automobile maintenance" scam that the car companies use to enslave us all.)
Consume for progress!!
Consume for progress!!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 12:40 pm (UTC)Poor ol' thing, I think it's doing remarkably well.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 12:47 pm (UTC)Love it, don't hate it. It's really done a remarkable job!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 01:02 pm (UTC)How different can a new type of email be, that the machine can't run it? (Don't answer that, I really don't want to know.)
"Look at this great new bread! Too bad it doesn't work in our toaster."
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 01:23 pm (UTC)Gmail is a beta-testing thing though, so it's not really surprising that they're writing it to only work with the newest browsers (and, in reality, they've covered like 6 different platforms which is more than other email sites bother to do).
So...um...yeah, you can't use a toaster for bagels!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 01:33 pm (UTC)Thank goodness we have a toaster oven.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 01:37 pm (UTC)I guarantee you that if that machine was a pc, it would be in the garbage by now.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 12:58 pm (UTC)