urbpan: (dandelion)
There’s one person’s LiveJournal that I’ve read for the past few years. It’s really two people—they’re a couple and they live in Boston and they foster pit bulls. For some reason I clung onto them five or six years ago. I don’t know how I found them, but I check in on both of them all the time. I sent the guy a book he was saying he wanted. I hoped he'd write on his blog, "A mysterious stranger sent me the book I wanted," but he never did.

That was Fiona Apple, interviewed in 2012 (and excepted in the oh no you didn't lj comm). The sad truth is that the book never arrived--I had a mailbox at a check cashing place for over 10 years, and then they stopped having mailboxes. I switched to a UPS store for a few years before I realized that I didn't make a zine anymore, and I didn't really need a special place for receiving mail from strangers. Somewhere in that span of time, the book was sent but lost in the postal void.

Fortunately, a short time later, I posted asking if anyone reading my journal was in Los Angeles, since I was going to be visiting. I got a VERY suspicious email from someone claiming to be Fiona Apple, and it caused me to wrack my brain trying to figure out who was trying to gaslight me. After a few emails back and forth, I became convinced that she was who she said she was.

Which was fortunate for me, because Fiona was exceptionally generous, providing opportunities for my father, brother, and I to be entertained at the Largo theater in Hollywood. We even got to meet Fiona backstage:



ANYway you've probably read most of this before, and what I'm trying to get around to saying is, Fiona got me the book again.

 photo P1030769_zpsnx4o7tqc.jpg

Thanks Fiona! So happy to have you in our life, and at our cottage.
urbpan: (dandelion)
 photo IMG_0702_zpse53f38c7.jpg
The oak skeletons of Franklin Park silhouetted against the 3:00 setting sun.

More snapshotty stuff that shows the Zoo Library )
urbpan: (dandelion)
 photo IMG_6329_zps226f4020.jpg

Hot sunny weekend, perfect for lounging barefoot in the back yard!


 photo IMG_6328_zpsd6515b67.jpg
These are the field guides on the windowsill right next to where I usually use my laptop. I have a lot more, but the most recently used books end up here.
urbpan: (dandelion)
 photo IMG_6178_zpsa59bc044.jpg

If you find a metallic or pearly red-to-pinkish disc adhered to the underside of a stone, you may wonder what it is. Or you may dismiss it--there's lots of stuff under stones, who cares, right? Oh someone cares, trust me.

Round bulges in the surface of the disc reveal its purpose. This is an egg-protecting device, silken and flush against the rock, difficult to remove or penetrate. It is made by a small spider that lives in such places--a spider with a body that somewhat resembles an ant, enough so to be lumped in with "ant-mimic ground spiders." The egg-case belongs to a spider known as "Phrurotimpus".

There are seventeen species in the genus Phrurotimpus in North America. According to some sources the name means "guardian of stones." My Composition of Scientific Words book verified "Phruro" to mean guard, but I was unable to find any etymology for "-timpus."

Many thanks as always to Charley Eiseman, whose book Tracks and Sign of Insects and Other Invertebrates has been an amazing revelation to me.
urbpan: (dandelion)


"Eating bugs makes sense, ecologically and economically. They also happen to taste really good. The more I eat insects, the more I respect them. Taking them from field or farm to plate has taught me, a recalcitrant urban-dweller, firsthand about the value of meat, and that it should never be wasted because it came from a living, breathing being not so different from us when you get right down to it. I don't believe we should clear all animal protein from our diets--partly because I've tried and it makes me feel exhausted, both mentally and physically (did you know that 'brain fog' is a commonly reported symptom among vegans?)--but mostly because that's not how our ancestors or closest primate relatives approached food. They tended to eat meat when they could. Not a lot of it, and certainly not as much of it as we do, but they did eat some.

We aren't ungulates, deftly digesting the cellulose in vegetable matter with giant internal fermenting tanks. We aren't carnivores, subsisting mainly off the flesh of other animals and not much else. We're omnivores by design. We eat everything--and part of that 'omni' includes some animals. Why not let it be insects, whose life cycles are generally much shorter, whose resource needs are fewer, who are the most plentiful creatures on Earth, and who are already being exterminated by the millions just because we find them annoying?"

From Edible by Daniella Martin. Free to read on Kindle!
urbpan: (dandelion)
IMG_0672

IMG_0673

IMG_0674
urbpan: (dandelion)


Sunday afternoon bookreading nap. Details: Alexis wearing jeans (and all the rest of her clothes) under the covers. I'm reading Idiot America. (Done. Now to read 1493.)
urbpan: (Default)


Our shelves were too heavy for the wall, so we took them down and moved the brackets so that they were in line with the studs. About a minute after I took this picture the cordless slipped on a stubborn screw and put a phillip's head puncture wound in the tip of my left index finger. It's mostly healed now, but boy was there a lot of blood! Alexis said, "I guess it's not really your house until you bleed on it."
urbpan: (Default)
Another point which became very obvious to me at Whipsnade was the totally erroneous idea that an animal was happier and therefore lived better in a larger cage or enclosure than a small one. “I don’t mind zoos if they’re like Whipsnade,” was the remark that was so frequently made by those well-meaning and ignorant animal lovers that I met. The answer was, of course, “You should have worked there—and experienced the difficulty of trying to keep a close daily check on a herd of animals in a thirty-five acre paddock, making sure they were developing no illness, that some of them were not being bullied to starvation level by the others, and that the whole group was getting enough to eat.”

If anything went wrong and you had to catch up an individual member of the herd, you would have to pursue it round thirty-five acres and when you had finally caught it—you hoped, without its dying of heart failure or breaking a leg—you had to treat it not only for whatever was wrong with it but for acute shock as well. Nowadays, of course, things are made much easier by the use of such refinements as dart guns, but in the days when I worked at Whipsnade the size of the paddock was ultimately detrimental to the animals. The only useful function they fulfilled was as a salve to the anthropomorphic souls of those animal lovers who did not like to see animals “imprisoned.” Unfortunately, this attitude toward zoos is still rife among the well-intentioned but basically ignorant who still insist on talking about Mother Nature as though she were a benevolent old lady instead of the harsh, unyielding and totally rapacious monster that she is.

It is hard to argue with these people; they live in a euphoric state where they believe that an animal in a zoo suffers as though it were in Dartmoor and an animal in its natural surroundings is living in a Garden of Eden where the lamb can lie down with the lion without starting in friendship and ending up as dinner. It is useless pointing out the ceaseless drudgery of finding adequate food supplies each day in the wilds, of the constant strain on the nerves of avoiding enemies, of the battle against disease and parasites, of the fact that in some species there is a more than a fifty percent mortality rate among their young in the first six months. “Ah,” these bemused animal lovers will say when these things are pointed out to them, “but they are free.” You point out that the animals have strict territories that are governed by three things: food, water, and sex. Provide all these successfully within a limited area and the animal will stay there. But people seem to be obsessed with this word “freedom,” particularly when applied to animals. They never seem to worry about the freedom of the bank clerks of Streatham, the miners of Durham, the factory hands of Sheffield, the carpenters of Hartley Wintney, or the headwaiters of Soho, yet if a careful survey were conducted on these and similar species you would find that they are as confined by their jobs and by convention as securely as any zoo inmate.

Gerald Durrell, A Bevy of Beasts, 1973
urbpan: (Default)
"First thing every morning, Harry and I would climb the fence into the zebra paddock and collect the velvety, dew-drenched crop of mushrooms that had sprouted there in the night. These Harry would cook in butter in a little saucepan, and we would devour them for our elevenses. They made a delicious meal, but the hazards involved in mushroom collecting with a couple of murderous zebra stallions in the paddock with you were extreme to say the least. We worked close together, with a pitchfork handy, and when one was bending down to pick mushrooms the other was watching the zebras. One morning there was a particularly fine crop and we had filled half a bucket and were congratulating ourselves upon the enormous feed we should be able to have at eleven o'clock. I was just bending down to pick up an exceptionally succulent mushroom when Harry shouted, 'Watch out, boy! The bastard's coming!'

I looked up and the zebra stallion was thundering toward me, his ears back, his lip pulled back over his yellow teeth. Leaving the bucket, I followed Harry's example and ran like a hare. We scrambled over the fence, panting and laughing. The zebra scudded to a halt by the bucket and glared at us, snorting indignantly. Then, to our extreme annoyance, he swiveled round and with immense accuracy kicked the bucket in a great swooping parabola through the air, scattering white mushrooms like a comet's tail. It took us half an hour to collect the mushrooms again."

From A Bevy of Beasts, by Gerald Durrell, 1973.
urbpan: (Cat in a box)
A number of people have posted a link to this article about a scientist who has shown that the parasitic protist Toxoplasma causes human behavior to change. Men become introverted, while infected women tend to be more outgoing. (He goes as far as to say that the parasite is responsible for thousands of car accidents every year, and may be a cause of schizophrenia.) I am not surprised by this, as I thought it was common knowledge (at least among nature nerds) that the parasite changes the behavior of rats, causing them to be attracted to the scent of cat urine, in order to get eaten by cats and get the parasite into the only place it can reproduce: inside a cat. There is some lay speculation among parasite fans that "crazy cat lady" syndrome is a form of toxoplasmosis.

What I am surprised by is that fact that no one has brought up the prophecies of John Hodgman, in his wise tome, THAT IS ALL. I will rectify that now, with a short excerpt of Hodgman's treatment of the subject:

January 11, 2012: The CDC announces they have now determined that toxoplasmosis has infected a third of the world's population. And what is more--IT IS COMMUNICATING WITH US.

January 12, 2012: The TOXOPLASMOTIC HIVE MIND makes first contact with the human race, sending an elderly woman draped in cats to the White House to deliver a greeting card. It is a Valentine's Day card from 1982 and below the printed message are hand-printed the words "Good morning. We want your planet. Come visit!"

January 13, 2012: The TOXOPLASMOTIC HIVE MIND activates the host organism known as Charlie Rose. On his program, Charlie Rose is seated alone at his desk, which is covered with rats. "We regret our last transmission," he says to the camera morosely. "All we desire is our own land where our moody men and promiscuous women can live and eat cat feces in peace. You have ten days to reply, or we take your planet." Charlie Rose suggests the new land shall be called Toxoplassachusetts.


Reading that alone in a bar caused me to burst out laughing, which made my neighbors shift uncomfortably on their stools. I didn't explain to them what was so funny--the parasites told me to keep it quiet.
urbpan: (Default)


Alexis and I went to a reading last week, conducted by the author of the book THAT IS ALL. It is the third in a series of complete world knowledge made up by HODGMAN, known better to me as "Judge John Hodgman" or @hodgman. He explained that the problem of coming up with complete world world knowledge, is that the world keeps adding more information to know, therefore, if the world were to end sometime such as December 21 2012, as the Mayans may have predicted, the complete world knowledge would then be truly complete.

It was a very entertaining and reasonably-priced evening of entertainment. And we took some pictures. Some of these are by me and some are by Alexis when she took my camera away from me to make it take better pictures.
Read more... )
urbpan: (Default)
My boss asked me if I knew of a good field guide to ferns and mosses (and "understory plants," as he called it) of the Northeast (North America) region. I had to admit that I didn't, but I would like to! I would love to ID the ferns and mosses and liverworts and horsetails and club-mosses (princess pine! I own a vintage copy of the Golden Guide to "Non-flowering plants" which covers fungi and lichens as well as spore-producing plants, and the Audubon guide to New England which has a few pages on Bryophytes and ferns and such. But a look on Amazon shows only a guide to the Northwestern region--curse them and their wonderful biodiversity!--nothing for us in the snowbound NE.

So, am I missing something? Is there another guide out there that covers what we're looking for?

I wish the "North Woods" series had one. The have the spider guide that I consult every time I find something with eight legs, and a tantalizing guide to lichens that I don't own yet, it would be nice for them to cover ferns and mosses.

Thanks in advance!
urbpan: (Default)
Thanks, everyone, for the congratulations and well-wishes. I'm making my 2011 blog project directly related to the house and the land it is on, so be prepared to be well sick of that half acre in a few months.

But I want to tell you about a field guide I picked up the other day. Actually, I picked it up in the summer and put it right back down. "Wild Urban Plants of the Northeast," sounds pretty perfect for me. But I was adamant about not getting new books, as I'm trying to whittle things down, not build them up. I already have a few decent weed and wildflower guides, and the great Sibley tree guide.

So I was back in that store a month later (the Audubon shop, attached to Drumlin Farm, where I was teaching a mushroom class) and it was still there. I picked it up again and opened it at random. It opened to pp.152-153, New England hawkweed Hieracium sabaudum. Instantly I recognized it as a very common plant that I've had a lot of trouble identifying, as seen here.


I took this picture in September of 2006, when I was in the thick of the 365 project, and desperate to identify this ubiquitous plant. The experts on my friends list agreed it was probably Canada hawkweed H. canadense. That didn't feel right to me, and I didn't end up using it in the project.

The first paragraph in the listing in the field guide reads "Even experts have trouble distinguishing this highly variable European species, H. lachenalii, and a native North American species H. canadense. Seeing this problem solved so elegantly (reading the rest of the description of H. sabaudum, especially the habitat requirements, made it plain that it was the species I was trying to identify) on the first page I opened to, clinched my decision to buy the book.

I honestly haven't had much chance to use it since I bought it, as most of our wild plants are on the wane, with only some tansy and some asters persisting. But I have flipped through it and have found it quite readable and straightforward. I've tested it a few times by looking for specific plants and I haven't stumped it yet. Some of the plants I've looked for have been included as a sidebar to another species (Pennsylvania smartweed appears on the page that describes pale smartweed--another common weed that has flummoxed me for years).

The Preface explains that the book was inspired by a trip the author made to Spectacle Island (a Boston Harbor island consisting of a capped landfill that is now a park, where we had an urban nature walk back in July 2006) so I knew he was local. The book covers Detroit eastward, south to Washington D.C. Still I was stunned to see this photograph:


This is literally across from my front door, as in: if I am standing on my front step looking straight ahead, that's what I see. You see the reddish stone stuff in the upper right of the photo? That's the arched footbridge over the Muddy that I've taken 5000 photos of, especially during the Muddy River project. Kind of freaky. Also embarrassing, as I have eaten berries from that bush, but was unsure of the species (Rubus can be a tricky genus). I have flipped through the book to see if there are any other places I recognize, but so far I haven't.


Alexis took this picture standing among the swamp dewberries, looking back at our front door.

So I guess what I'm saying is, any field guide to urban plants of the northeast that uses a picture of berry bushes from in front of my house is okay with me.



Wild Urban Plants of the Northeast, A Field Guide. Peter Del Tredici. Cornell University Press 2010. The price on the cover is 29.95, but it seems to be pretty reliably about 20 bucks online. Well worth it.
urbpan: (Default)
Amazing. Alexis posts that she has stuff to give away, and her friends actually want it! Well, it IS Hello Kitty stuff.

We did the first cut of knick-knack items, and filled one box. It was surprisingly easy to look at items that I once considered indispensable enough to put up on a shelf to gather dust and dispense with them. Even the Simpson's stuff! Anyone want any Simpson's stuff?

I also brought one box of books and one box of CDs to the library and left them on their loading dock, per their instructions on their website. Also surprisingly easy, considering I spent good impulse internet money on many of those books from Amazon.com. You may ask, why don't I sell them back on Amazon, or Ebay, or half.com or whatever, and those are one good question split into many, with one disappointing answer which is I am terribly lazy. The more effort I put into dispensing with my things, the more depressed I get, and with winter and the horrible xmas holiday essentially upon us (they are upon us, go to a store and see) I don't need any other reasons to be depressed. Especially considering my life is pretty excellent and I have no reason to be depressed, except for, you know, the brain chemistry thing.

I have several more loads of books to dispense, and since I've tried arranging them by who might want them, subject, and size, and different times, they are completely random. Wicca, natural history, humor, photos of the earth from space, you name it, the usual kinds of stuff people get rid of when they move. Or are planning to move at an as-yet undetermined time in the probably near future.

So if you want anything I used to own, let me know. Let me know especially if you live in the area and are willing to drive by my house and pick the stuff up off the curb, because that's the level of effort I'm willing to put into this. Or if you want any of my old books or CDS, just check them out of the Brookline Library.
urbpan: (phidippus)


Well, it can't hurt to put it in my wish list, right?
urbpan: (Shatner)
The other day, on a whim, I grabbed a book off the recent arrivals shelf of my local library. It was In the Land of Invented Languages by Arika Okrent. The author is a young linguist who made a project out of researching the history of "made up" languages--those languages invented whole cloth in most cases by idealists trying to perfect language itself.

She spends a good amount of the book discussing three of the most successful invented languages: First, Esperanto, an attempt at a universal language using mostly Latin roots, with simple grammar and syntax and pronunciation rules, with vague notions of world peace and harmony as its origins. It lives on today, is pretty easy to learn (I'm taking a half-hearted whack at it), and has a body of literature, and even a William Shatner movie.

Of course, the same can be said for the Klingon language, and Okrent explains how a few gutteral hacking noises were assembled by a scholarly linguist into a working language with hundreds of casual users and a couple dozen conversational speakers. She goes deep, taking the Klingon language aptitude exam and accompanying the Klingons as they embarrass the crap out of her at a restaurant.

And she also hangs out with the speakers of Lojban, a mind-bogglingly complicated set of logical rules that comprises a language that enables incredibly precise and non-ambiguous statements to be made. Of course programmers love it, and I can only imagine its appeal to the Asperger's community. This was a good lead in to the modern "comlang" community of people who spend an awful lot of time making up languages and arguing with others about made up languages. I suspect that many of the people reading this know a lot more about this than I do.

I enjoyed the discussion of what made an invented language a success or a failure, and about what each language actually reveals about language itself. The stories about language inventors of the past, and what lengths they took to promote their creations tell us much about human nature, ingenuity and passion. I love the inescapable conclusion that there is no such http://www.livejournal.com/update.bmlthing as a universal set of symbols: they all reveal individual and cultural influences and biases.


Today I came home to discover an autographed copy of The Sibley Guide to Trees on my front step. A friend who still works at Drumlin Farm sent it to me, an extremely thoughtful gift. (I did telegraph my great desire to own it across Facebook and Livejournal.) I haven't even flipped through it yet, but I have a long weekend to try and soak it up and use it. Alexis, her IM voice dripping with vitamin D deprived scorn, said "does it have a way to identify trees using their leafless silhouettes?" Of course it does, where appropriate. Bark, buds, and twigs are also depicted, so I believe it is a guide that will be useful year round.

The friend who got it for me described talking to Sibley about the book: "He had a great analogy comparing bird field guides of 100 years ago with the still current tree ID guides that start with ‘is it opposite or alternate’. 100 years ago the way to ID a bird was to shoot it and then look at it in your hand. He’s trying to get people to look at trees in a similar way to bird guides now where you ID from distinguishing characteristics of the whole organism – the geist of the tree as it were." Well, hopefully after this weekend I'll have an idea of what that means.

ĝis revido!
urbpan: (oak man)
It's been a while since I've seen the image of a product and felt a visceral desire to own it. Someone just posted a link mentioning The Sibley Guide to Trees and I felt that desire grab my chest.



The Sibley Guide to Birds upended the status quo in bird guides by simply being better than anything else out there. It meticulously depicted all the North American bird species, the plumage of both sexes and that of juveniles, as well as regional and unusual variations. It included how postures and temperature can change the silhouette of a bird, and detailed the anatomical terms of different plumage areas. There was a huge one for both coasts and field-sized east and west coast editions.

The fact that it was also a labor of love of one self-taught birder crossing the country for a decade in a van full of paint and canvases made me feel great to buy it. I met David Sibley at the Audubon Shop in Lincoln, and found that he was humble and personable, and living in Concord, practically a neighbor.

I have an ugly void in my field guides where a great tree guide belongs. I have an ancient golden guide, which has sufficed, and a guide to urban trees which helps fill out the commonly planted exotics. The fact that Sibley has now applied his "formidable skills of identification and illustration to the trees of North America" is the best news I've read in a long time.

I am loathe to add more possessions to my life, but I am willing to trade. If you have an extra copy of this book, I will gladly exchange a huge amount of used CDs--in excess of double the value of the book--for it. I know it's a long shot, and that I'll probably just buy myself a copy at the Audubon Shop when I go to Drumlin Farm September 27th to teach a mushroom class. But if you want a huge amount of used CDs, this would be a great opportunity for you.

I hope he's working on a shrubs and herbaceous perennials book!
urbpan: (Cat in a box)
Since I'm a posting fool today, I may as well share these book recommendations from a facebook meme. They are more interesting to the people who read this journal than to my facebook friends anyway.  I've already written about most of these in this journal, but it might be nice to have them all in one place.   The rules of the meme state that your first entry has to be the book you are currently reading.

Most of these are sciencey books but are written for the digestion of laypersons. No degree is needed to appreciate them.

1. The Ghosts of Evolution / I wasn't going to recommend it, but it is what I'm reading now. It's about the very fascinating subject of plants that evolved alongside seed-dispersing animals such as giant sloths and mastodons which are now extinct. It's not very well written, however, I like the subject enough that I'm digging through it. It's by Connie Barlow. 

2. I'm also reading The New Kings of Non-Fiction, edited by Ira Glass. I got it when I donated to NPR. It has short pieces by lots of different people, including many of the authors on this list, and famous New Yorker essayists.

3. Song of the Dodo / Rather tomelike but entertaining piece on island biogeography, and how all biology is becoming similar to it, by David Quammen. I would recommend reading anything by Quammen, who recently has been writing stuff about Darwin for National Geographic. Let me take this opportunity to link to his essay Planet of Weeds, again.

4. Beast in the Garden / A natural history book that reads like a pulp crime novel, about the way the world is has changed in such a way as to put mountain lions into dangerous proximity to humans, by David Baron.

5. Dogs: A New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior, and Evolution / A sensible and pragmatic approach to understanding dogs, based on a much more likely alternative to the "cavemen stealing wolf puppies" origin of domestic dogs.  By Ray and Lorna Coppinger.

6. Parasite Rex / About the vital role parasites have played in the evolution of other animals, and how parasites can manipulate the behavior of other animals. By Carl Zimmer.

7. The Omnivore's Dilemma / Hard to imagine that anyone who has heard of this book hasn't already committed to reading it or to avoiding it, but I heartily recommend it. Utterly compelling, and very important; by Michael Pollan (I also recommend The Botany of Desire by the same author.)

8. A Short History of Nearly Everything / Best introduction to the natural sciences ever written. Fully integrates Cosmology, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, with a bit of gossiping about the personalities involved in developing these sciences. By Bill Bryson, who has written a bunch of stuff that people have recommended to me that I haven't read yet.

9. When You are Engulfed in Flames / The latest book by the 21st century Mark Twain, David Sedaris. I've read everything he's written (I prefer the semi-fictionalfamily memoirs to the fully fictional plays and stories with animal characters) and have the laugh lines and split sides to prove it.

10. Dear Mr. Mackin and Thank You for your Continued Interest / Two collections of letters to and responses from corporations, by my former classmate Rich Mackin. These letters highlight the absurdity of modern consumerist culture; he's speaking truth to power, and power's response is pretty hilarious.
urbpan: (spooky)
My old friend Kelly Link has a new collection of "weirdly wonderful" short stories for young adults called Pretty Monsters, and she's reading from it at the Harvard Book Store tomorrow evening at 7.  If you don't know her work, but are a fan of Neil Gaiman, magic realism, or "the grotesque and the ethereal," you should definitely check it out.



Profile

urbpan: (Default)
urbpan

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 05:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios